He just forgot to mention the artist was Picasso.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've heard it said, probably more seriously than in jest, that the world would be a better place if we elected women as our leaders instead of men. Men, the reasoning goes, are quick to pick up arms and go to war when they don't get their way, while women would be more likely to sit down with their adversaries and work out their differences. But why limit it just to our elected leaders? Why not our military, too?
Think about it: Instead of having the oceans filled with these...
and the skies filled with these...
we would only need a couple hundred of these...
We could strategically park them around Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, North Korea....really any country we wanted to bring to their knees, then just turn up the volume. My proposed new all-female army could nag any male dominated country in the world into doing anything.
Give up their nuclear arms aspirations....done. Stop threatening their neighbors....check. Whip those Al Qaeda boys into shape....watch a Sex In the City marathon....learn line dancing....eat quiche...."yes dear". And we could cut our military spending from $700B a year to just a few million. What budget deficit?
Oh....and the world would be a much better dressed place, too. ;)
S
