Showing posts with label Federal Reserve. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Federal Reserve. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Sir, could you spare a dime for an old, broke banker?

Anti-banker post.  Move on now if you're here looking for butterflies and cute puppies.


Ever hear of the term "corporate welfare"?  Want an example?  After the financial meltdown of '08 the Federales quietly did what they could to get the banks back on their feet.  We know about the bailout loans, but did you know we just flat-out gave them money, too?

The Federal Reserve dropped the interest rate on post-crash loans they made to the banks (a regular occurrence) to 0%.  The banks borrowed by the truckload, which meant the Fed had to sell paper to finance the "deficit" this caused.  Then the banks turned right around, using their free borrowed money to buy government notes which paid them several percent (?) interest.

THAT'S how you re-capitalize a bank at taxpayers expense.

Imagine....free money!  It was a 100% risk free transfer of money from your government directly to the banks.  I would have liked a little piece of that, too.  *Dream on Scott*


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I saw an interesting piece on TV last night about rogue traders.  These are bankers (think: "London Whale") who work with little direct oversight buying and selling things such as foreign currencies, etc.  I have virtually no idea how it works but suffice it to say it amounts to high-stakes gambling with bank money.  

If they lose, they can bring down the bank.  True!  It's happened.  On the other hand, if they win, it's a mega payday for the bank, and the bankers.  Lose, they get a government handout.  Win, and it's party time!

The program interviewed some well known (within financial circles) rogue traders who got caught.  They told of how easy it was to fool their bank's risk management people, the regulators, and how easy it was to hide losses.

Here is what I took away:  It's still going on today.  Internal red flags are still brushed aside....as long as the profits keep coming.

You'd think that after the financial interests nearly blew up the world in 2008, we, the taxpayers who baled them out, would know better than to let them go right back to conducting risky business as usual, but we did. 

Our politicians are stuffing their pockets with bank "campaign contributions" and signing off on whatever the bankers want.  Post-meltdown bank "reform" was a joke. Our regulators are inept.  The bankers are still living extremely well on their ill-gotten gains while the rest of us are struggling to recover from the mess they made.

Remember this:  There will someday, sooner rather than later, be another giant financial catastrophe.  Don't think that things have stabilized and go back to living like all is well.  Scary, but all the ingredients are in place right now.  Don't say you weren't warned.

Now, go have a nice day.  :)

S




Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Congressional hypocracy?



The US House of Representatives recently passed, with strong bipartisan support, a bill known as the "Audit The Fed Act", and it's expected to pass the Senate shortly, too.  It's purpose is, as the name implies, to audit the Federal Reserve.  The Fed's balance sheet has ballooned from $800B in 2007 to $2.8T today, and we don't know where the money went.  It seems they've made many promises backed by the US taxpayers, but we don't really know to whom or by how much.  Congress is asking for complete transparency with an audit.  BRAVO! 


But hold on there Kemosabe.  There's also a bill before Congress known as "The Disclose Act" that seeks to require transparency in political campaign contributions.  Traditional tax-exempt organizations, aka 501(C)(3) in IRS lingo, can make political contributions but must disclose the source of the money they're giving.  The currently popular 501(C)(4) "educational" tax-exempt organizations can give all they want through their Super-Pacs WITHOUT disclosing where the money is coming from.  (Pretty slick loophole, huh?)  And surprise!...surprise!....so far a mere 200 donors have made 80% of all Super Pac donations this campaign season, out of approx. 310 million Americans. 


Can you see the potential for abuse here?  A wealthy individual or group could quite literally buy a congressman or two (or 535) without We The People ever knowing who's pulling the strings. If there was ever a situation that needed transparency, this is it, but the Republican-controlled Senate refuses to take a vote on it.  It's DOA in the Senate.


Come on Republicans.  This is making you guys look VERY bad.  Whenever someone tries to hide something from me I tend to imagine the worst.  How can you be FOR transparency when it suits you (The Audit The Fed Act), but AGAINST transparency when it exposes something you (apparently) don't want exposed (The Disclose Act)?  Oh...I think I just answered my own question.


This doesn't pass my smell test. 


S