There is an email going around that says a coup is underway to oust John Boehner as Speaker of the House and replace him with Paul Ryan. (Hmmm...I actually thought it would be Eric Cantor who would lead the revolt.) I'm no big fan of John Boehner, but I feel like he would be someone who could/would negotiate with the Democrats.
Paul Ryan is a headline-grabbing "my way or the highway" kinda guy. Bad move, Republicans! The Tea Party-ers apparently didn't get the message: The People have repudiated extreme politics. They want our leaders to work together to get something done and not throw us all under the bus.
My concern is that if this is true and Ryan (or Cantor) does become Speaker, we're going over the "fiscal cliff" next year. Sequestration (across-the-board spending cuts) will automatically kick in, cutting not only fat from government (good) but meat, too (bad). And we can ALL see our paychecks reduced when the "Bush tax cuts" expire and we go back to our previous tax rates. Ouch! Ryan has said, and I believe him, that he will NEVER allow taxes to go up on the wealthy.
"If my friends can't get their tax cut, then none of you can, either."
Ryan says the wealthy are the "job creators", which is a half-truth at best. While the wealthy might be "incubators" of new businesses, they depend on middle class consumers to actually buy whatever the new businesses are selling in order to succeed. If the middle-class has their take-home pay reduced due to higher taxes, they'll buy less. New businesses will stagnate or even fail, perhaps taking us into another recession. How would that create any new jobs?
Whatever the two sides can negotiate regarding tax rates for the wealthy, so be it, but don't hold the middle class hostage in the process. The election is over. Now we need leaders, not ideologues.
S
Showing posts with label sequestration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sequestration. Show all posts
Monday, November 12, 2012
Monday, November 5, 2012
Last minute election thoughts
I feel like I'm watching a really interesting football game, with every offensive thrust countered with a defensive parry. Momentum has changed, subtle adjustments have been made, and a bit of luck has been thrown in, too. It will likely be a field goal as the clock expires that will give us a winner. Except this isn't a game. This is much more serious. This could conceivably change the way our country is governed for decades to come. I'm talking about tomorrow's presidential and congressional elections.
Here's what has been bugging me for months now: Mitt Romney's choice of running mate. I've always thought of Romney as a moderate, but in the primaries he recited loud and often the Tea Party line, which scared the bejeebers out of me. At the first debate Mitt did a complete 180, coming across as a moderate, and his fortunes improved immediately afterwards. I'm hoping the "new" Mitt is the "real" Mitt, but in the background he's still there....his running mate, Paul Ryan, and I wonder.
Ryan is a proud member...a leader, even...of the Young Guns, a group of extremist, ultra-conservative Republicans who want to gain control of, first, their party, and then the country. They have demonstrated they are willing to throw the entire country under the bus* as long as it will hasten their power grab. (Suggested reading: Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the US House of Representatives by Robert Draper.)
They practice the concept of the more they can do to paralyze the country (by their obstruction) and discredit their opponents, the worse things will get and the sooner The People will turn to them to fix things. The pain the rest of us must endure in the process is of apparently no concern to them. To them the end justifies the means. I agree there are lots of things that need changing, but IMO the changes need to be made thoughtfully with a scalpel, not with an ulterior motive and a meat cleaver. All these guys have are meat cleavers.
Now I read that Paul Ryan, "quiet for now, is planning for an active role" as Romney's VP. "...if the Republican ticket prevails, Mr. Ryan plans to come back roaring, establishing an activist vice presidency that he said would look like Dick Cheney's under President George W. Bush." (There are to this day many loyal, moderate Republicans who cringe at that thought!) He says he will "reach out" (to Democrats) across the aisle. (Riiight...and pigs will fly south for the winter. It's just not the way the Young Guns do business.)
I just hope that if Mitt Romney should win he governs like the responsible moderate our country needs, and not like a "slash and burn" Young Gun. And as for Paul Ryan, "Vice Presidents should be seen (at funerals of foreign dignitaries) and not heard."
If you disagree, that's fine. Just be glad we live in America where we're all free to express ourselves however we like. :)
S
*The current budget "sequestration" mess and past (and future?) budget impasses...the work of the Young Guns.
Here's what has been bugging me for months now: Mitt Romney's choice of running mate. I've always thought of Romney as a moderate, but in the primaries he recited loud and often the Tea Party line, which scared the bejeebers out of me. At the first debate Mitt did a complete 180, coming across as a moderate, and his fortunes improved immediately afterwards. I'm hoping the "new" Mitt is the "real" Mitt, but in the background he's still there....his running mate, Paul Ryan, and I wonder.
Be very afraid...the Young Gun leadership (L-R, Reps. Kevin McCarthy, Eric Cantor, and Paul Ryan)
Ryan is a proud member...a leader, even...of the Young Guns, a group of extremist, ultra-conservative Republicans who want to gain control of, first, their party, and then the country. They have demonstrated they are willing to throw the entire country under the bus* as long as it will hasten their power grab. (Suggested reading: Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the US House of Representatives by Robert Draper.)
They practice the concept of the more they can do to paralyze the country (by their obstruction) and discredit their opponents, the worse things will get and the sooner The People will turn to them to fix things. The pain the rest of us must endure in the process is of apparently no concern to them. To them the end justifies the means. I agree there are lots of things that need changing, but IMO the changes need to be made thoughtfully with a scalpel, not with an ulterior motive and a meat cleaver. All these guys have are meat cleavers.
Now I read that Paul Ryan, "quiet for now, is planning for an active role" as Romney's VP. "...if the Republican ticket prevails, Mr. Ryan plans to come back roaring, establishing an activist vice presidency that he said would look like Dick Cheney's under President George W. Bush." (There are to this day many loyal, moderate Republicans who cringe at that thought!) He says he will "reach out" (to Democrats) across the aisle. (Riiight...and pigs will fly south for the winter. It's just not the way the Young Guns do business.)
I just hope that if Mitt Romney should win he governs like the responsible moderate our country needs, and not like a "slash and burn" Young Gun. And as for Paul Ryan, "Vice Presidents should be seen (at funerals of foreign dignitaries) and not heard."
If you disagree, that's fine. Just be glad we live in America where we're all free to express ourselves however we like. :)
S
*The current budget "sequestration" mess and past (and future?) budget impasses...the work of the Young Guns.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Democrats,
Dick Cheney,
election 2012,
Eric Cantor,
extremeists,
George W. Bush,
Kevin McCarthy,
Mitt Romney,
moderate,
obstructionists,
Paul Ryan,
Republicans,
sequestration,
Tea Party,
Young Guns
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)