Monday, September 17, 2012

The "Pelosi-Ryan" connection



Yesterday on the news I saw GOP Veep candidate Paul Ryan trying to explain why Mitt Romney won't divulge any specific tax loopholes he would close or what tax rates he would set if he's elected.  They're being vague, he said, "....because we want to get it done."  He went on to say, "We don't want to presume to say, 'Here's exactly our way or the highway, take it or leave it Congress.'"  Huh?
Ummm, Paul....that's exactly what the Tea Party "Young Guns" have been saying since they got to Congress:  "Here's what we demand, take it or leave it."  No compromise, no way.
And didn't the Republicans lambaste then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi for her quip during the debate over health care reform when she said, "We'll just have to pass this bill so you can see what's in it"? 

Aren't Romney and Ryan doing the same thing, in essence saying, "You'll just have to vote for us so you can see what were going to do with your taxes"? 
One of my favorite old sayings is, "If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem."  Looking around Washington today I see lot's of "problems" and very few "solutions".  

Even though you might have some potential solutions, unless you're willing to work with others, you have nothing.  Therefore you're still a "problem".
Whenever politicians, any politicians, try to fluff me off by just saying "trust me and I'll fix everything",  I immediately grab my wallet and back myself into a corner, 'cause I'm fixin' to either get robbed or screwed....quite likely both.

S


3 comments:

  1. What I always want to know when I see these ads saying we need to cut the deficit to create jobs is how exactly does cutting the government deficit create private-sector jobs?

    Anyway, Romney-Ryan are straining to do some explaining these days.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Romney-Ryan team is having a hard time staying on the subject, aren't they?

    ReplyDelete
  3. We've seen all too often what happens when politicians run on one thing and then govern on another. Wisconsin and Gov. Walker come to mind.

    ReplyDelete